Conventional χ-separation compared to self-calibrated method (BIOPHYSICSS-DL) with histological validation


Conference paper


Benslimane I, Grabner G, Hametner S, Jochmann T, Zivadinov R, Schweser F
Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2023

Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
I, B., G, G., S, H., T, J., R, Z., & F, S. (2023). Conventional χ-separation compared to self-calibrated method (BIOPHYSICSS-DL) with histological validation. Toronto, ON, Canada.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
I, Benslimane, Grabner G, Hametner S, Jochmann T, Zivadinov R, and Schweser F. “Conventional χ-Separation Compared to Self-Calibrated Method (BIOPHYSICSS-DL) with Histological Validation.” Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. Toronto, ON, Canada, 2023.


MLA   Click to copy
I, Benslimane, et al. Conventional χ-Separation Compared to Self-Calibrated Method (BIOPHYSICSS-DL) with Histological Validation. 2023.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@inproceedings{benslimane2023a,
  title = {Conventional χ-separation compared to self-calibrated method (BIOPHYSICSS-DL) with histological validation},
  year = {2023},
  address = {Toronto, ON, Canada},
  series = {Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med},
  author = {I, Benslimane and G, Grabner and S, Hametner and T, Jochmann and R, Zivadinov and F, Schweser}
}





Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in